Difference between revisions of "The Pleasure of the Interface"
From Clockworks2
Jump to navigationJump to searchLine 1: | Line 1: | ||
Springer, Claudia. "The Pleasure of the Interface" (1991). Anthologized ''[[Cybersexualities: A Reader on Feminist Theory, Cyborgs and Cyberspace]]''. Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP, 1999. Mentioned in Veronica Hollinger's review of ''Cybersexualities'', "[[Doing It for Ourselves: Two Feminist Cyber-Readers]]," our source here, q.v. | Springer, Claudia. "The Pleasure of the Interface" (1991). Anthologized ''[[Cybersexualities: A Reader on Feminist Theory, Cyborgs and Cyberspace]]''. Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP, 1999. Mentioned in Veronica Hollinger's review of ''Cybersexualities'', "[[Doing It for Ourselves: Two Feminist Cyber-Readers]]," our source here, q.v. | ||
− | "Springer’s essay looks at the contradictions and complexities of erotic desire as constructed through and experienced by cyborgs and techno-bodies in a range of sf texts, including novels, comics, and films" (Hollinger 428) | + | "Springer’s essay looks at the contradictions and complexities of erotic desire as constructed through and experienced by cyborgs and techno-bodies in a range of sf texts, including novels, comics, and films." Hollinger somewhat ruefully notes — if without surprise — the conclusion that "the cyborg’s potential for disrupting gender categories has rarely been fulfilled" in these works (Hollinger 428). |
− | |||
Revision as of 20:26, 9 June 2019
Springer, Claudia. "The Pleasure of the Interface" (1991). Anthologized Cybersexualities: A Reader on Feminist Theory, Cyborgs and Cyberspace. Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP, 1999. Mentioned in Veronica Hollinger's review of Cybersexualities, "Doing It for Ourselves: Two Feminist Cyber-Readers," our source here, q.v.
"Springer’s essay looks at the contradictions and complexities of erotic desire as constructed through and experienced by cyborgs and techno-bodies in a range of sf texts, including novels, comics, and films." Hollinger somewhat ruefully notes — if without surprise — the conclusion that "the cyborg’s potential for disrupting gender categories has rarely been fulfilled" in these works (Hollinger 428).
RDE, completing, 9June19