Difference between revisions of "The Pleasure of the Interface"

From Clockworks2
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Springer, Claudia. "The Pleasure of the Interface" (1991). Anthologized ''[[Cybersexualities: A Reader on Feminist Theory, Cyborgs and Cyberspace]]''. Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP, 1999. Mentioned in Veronica Hollinger's review of ''Cybersexualities'', "[[Doing It for Ourselves: Two Feminist Cyber-Readers]]," our source here, q.v.
+
'''Springer, Claudia. "The Pleasure of the Interface"''' (1991). Anthologized ''[[Cybersexualities: A Reader on Feminist Theory, Cyborgs and Cyberspace]]''. Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP, 1999. Mentioned in Veronica Hollinger's review of ''Cybersexualities'', "[[Doing It for Ourselves: Two Feminist Cyber-Readers]]," our source here, q.v.
 
 
"Springer’s essay looks at the contradictions and complexities of erotic desire as constructed through and experienced by cyborgs and techno-bodies in a range of sf texts, including novels, comics, and films" (Hollinger 428)
 
  
 +
"Springer’s essay looks at the contradictions and complexities of erotic desire as constructed through and experienced by cyborgs and techno-bodies in a range of sf texts, including novels, comics, and films." Hollinger somewhat ruefully notes — if without surprise — the conclusion that "the cyborg’s potential for disrupting gender categories has rarely been fulfilled" in these works (Hollinger 428).
  
  

Latest revision as of 20:27, 9 June 2019

Springer, Claudia. "The Pleasure of the Interface" (1991). Anthologized Cybersexualities: A Reader on Feminist Theory, Cyborgs and Cyberspace. Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP, 1999. Mentioned in Veronica Hollinger's review of Cybersexualities, "Doing It for Ourselves: Two Feminist Cyber-Readers," our source here, q.v.

"Springer’s essay looks at the contradictions and complexities of erotic desire as constructed through and experienced by cyborgs and techno-bodies in a range of sf texts, including novels, comics, and films." Hollinger somewhat ruefully notes — if without surprise — the conclusion that "the cyborg’s potential for disrupting gender categories has rarely been fulfilled" in these works (Hollinger 428).


RDE, completing, 9June19