Difference between revisions of "Player Piano"
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The near-future world of ''PP'' is run by machines and a technocratic elite, most especially, industrial jobs are done by automated machines. Discussed in ''[[Clockwork Worlds, ed. Erlich & Dunn|Clockwork Worlds]]'' in the essays by [[Pilgrim's Progress: Is Kurt Vonnegut, Jr., Winning His War with Machines?|T. Hoffman]] and [[The Theme of Mechanization in Player Piano|L. Broer]] (q.v. under Literary Criticism).[http://www.clockworks2.org/wiki/index.php?title=Clockwork_Worlds,_ed._Erlich_%26_Dunn] See for a relatively early work expressing fear of what would be realized in the use of robots and robotics later in the 20th century and into the 21st, expressed by Kurt Vonnegut, who would go on to become a major US author, and one who suggested "the canary in the coal mine theory of the arts," with artists warning of impending dangers.[https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Kurt_Vonnegut#Various_interviews] | The near-future world of ''PP'' is run by machines and a technocratic elite, most especially, industrial jobs are done by automated machines. Discussed in ''[[Clockwork Worlds, ed. Erlich & Dunn|Clockwork Worlds]]'' in the essays by [[Pilgrim's Progress: Is Kurt Vonnegut, Jr., Winning His War with Machines?|T. Hoffman]] and [[The Theme of Mechanization in Player Piano|L. Broer]] (q.v. under Literary Criticism).[http://www.clockworks2.org/wiki/index.php?title=Clockwork_Worlds,_ed._Erlich_%26_Dunn] See for a relatively early work expressing fear of what would be realized in the use of robots and robotics later in the 20th century and into the 21st, expressed by Kurt Vonnegut, who would go on to become a major US author, and one who suggested "the canary in the coal mine theory of the arts," with artists warning of impending dangers.[https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Kurt_Vonnegut#Various_interviews] | ||
| + | |||
| + | See Chapter 32 for image of the superimposition of the electronic (and primitively cybernetic?) on the human, specifically the protagonist, Paul Proteus, on trial, hooked up to a very large lie-detection device: "There, beside and above Doctor Paul Proteus, sat the judge — the Sky Manager [from a propaganda playlet], Paul thought. The accused [...] resembled less a man than an old-fashioned switchboard, with wires running from temperature-, pressure-, and moisture-sensitive instruments at his writs, armpits, chest,k temples and palms. These, in turn, ran to a gray cabinet under the witness stand, where their findings were interpreted and relayed to a dial a yard in diameter over Paul's head" (pp. 293-94). The lie-detector works, so there is here also a hint of subtle penetration of Paul's brain or psyche. | ||
| + | |||
Discussed in "[[The Player Piano and Musico-Cybernetic Science Fiction between the 1950s and the 1980s: Kurt Vonnegut and Philip K. Dick]]," which see. | Discussed in "[[The Player Piano and Musico-Cybernetic Science Fiction between the 1950s and the 1980s: Kurt Vonnegut and Philip K. Dick]]," which see. | ||
Significantly ''not'' mentioned explicitly, nor is the title nor "Vonnegut" listed in the Index; but you have in chapter 23, "Computers and Art" in O. B. Hardison's ''[[Disappearing Through the Skylight: Culture and Technology in the Twentieth Century]]'' an observation that parallels a key point in the trial scene in ''Player Piano'': "A definition of what it is to be human is thus an unexpected but provocative by-product of computer art: 'To err is human.' What distinguishes man from machine is the tendency to make mistakes" (Hardison, p. 217). | Significantly ''not'' mentioned explicitly, nor is the title nor "Vonnegut" listed in the Index; but you have in chapter 23, "Computers and Art" in O. B. Hardison's ''[[Disappearing Through the Skylight: Culture and Technology in the Twentieth Century]]'' an observation that parallels a key point in the trial scene in ''Player Piano'': "A definition of what it is to be human is thus an unexpected but provocative by-product of computer art: 'To err is human.' What distinguishes man from machine is the tendency to make mistakes" (Hardison, p. 217). | ||
| + | |||
| + | Increasingly relevant again as made clear in another work that doesn't mention it, Buchanan and Imbrie's ''[[The New Fire: War, Peace, and Democracy in the Age of AI]]''. | ||
Revision as of 22:58, 5 May 2022
Vonnegut, Kurt, Jr. Player Piano (vt Utopia 14). New York: Scribner's, 1952. New York: Dell, 1974.
The near-future world of PP is run by machines and a technocratic elite, most especially, industrial jobs are done by automated machines. Discussed in Clockwork Worlds in the essays by T. Hoffman and L. Broer (q.v. under Literary Criticism).[1] See for a relatively early work expressing fear of what would be realized in the use of robots and robotics later in the 20th century and into the 21st, expressed by Kurt Vonnegut, who would go on to become a major US author, and one who suggested "the canary in the coal mine theory of the arts," with artists warning of impending dangers.[2]
See Chapter 32 for image of the superimposition of the electronic (and primitively cybernetic?) on the human, specifically the protagonist, Paul Proteus, on trial, hooked up to a very large lie-detection device: "There, beside and above Doctor Paul Proteus, sat the judge — the Sky Manager [from a propaganda playlet], Paul thought. The accused [...] resembled less a man than an old-fashioned switchboard, with wires running from temperature-, pressure-, and moisture-sensitive instruments at his writs, armpits, chest,k temples and palms. These, in turn, ran to a gray cabinet under the witness stand, where their findings were interpreted and relayed to a dial a yard in diameter over Paul's head" (pp. 293-94). The lie-detector works, so there is here also a hint of subtle penetration of Paul's brain or psyche.
Discussed in "The Player Piano and Musico-Cybernetic Science Fiction between the 1950s and the 1980s: Kurt Vonnegut and Philip K. Dick," which see.
Significantly not mentioned explicitly, nor is the title nor "Vonnegut" listed in the Index; but you have in chapter 23, "Computers and Art" in O. B. Hardison's Disappearing Through the Skylight: Culture and Technology in the Twentieth Century an observation that parallels a key point in the trial scene in Player Piano: "A definition of what it is to be human is thus an unexpected but provocative by-product of computer art: 'To err is human.' What distinguishes man from machine is the tendency to make mistakes" (Hardison, p. 217).
Increasingly relevant again as made clear in another work that doesn't mention it, Buchanan and Imbrie's The New Fire: War, Peace, and Democracy in the Age of AI.
RDE, initial; finishing, 18Jan22, 26Feb22
